HOME     POLLS     SEARCH

BLUE JAYS CENTRAL


Confusing fan interference call from Blue Jays game was technically correct


PUBLICATION
Roger Macpherson
September 17, 2025  (8:40 PM)
SHARE THIS STORY
FOLLOW US

Nathan Lukes missing out on a home run ball
Photo credit: https://www.bluebirdbanter.com

Fans love to hate on umpires, but in the case of last night's game, the correct call was made.

The play in question happened in the bottom of the third inning. With one and two out, Tampa Bay Rays batter Brandon Lowe hit a long fly ball to right field. The Blue Jays' Nathan Lukes gave chase, reaching up over the fence at the same time as a fan, who ultimately ended up with a souvenir.
A home run was called, but the Blue Jays and manager John Schneider appealed on the basis of fan interference.
This is where things get strange.
After going to review, crew chief Laz Diaz announced that it was fan interference and that the call on the field was overturned. However, it would have been a home run anyway and still counted. Huh?
There was fan interference but it would have been a home run anyway." ...uh, come again?!

Two rules at play

Looking at the official Major League Baseball rulebook, there are actually two different rules that came into play.
The first defines what spectator interference actually is.
Spectator interference occurs when a spectator (or an object thrown by the spectator) hinders a player's attempt to make a play on a live ball, by going onto the playing field, or reaching out of the stands and over the playing field


However, rule 6.01 (e) goes on to state that
When there is spectator interference with any thrown or batted ball, the ball shall be dead at the moment of interference and the umpire shall impose such penalties as in their opinion will nullify the act of interference.

Essentially, where the reply agreed with the fact that the fan impeded with Lukes attempt to make a catch, - thereby denoting fan interference - however, partially due to the lack of angles available in a minor league ballpark, the same replay officials were unable to determine what would have happened had there not been fan interference. Essentially, they couldn't guarantee that Lukes would have definitely caught the ball.
While the language was strangely worded, the lack of clear and convincing evidence made the home run call stand.
Strange, but true.
POLL
SEPTEMBRE 17   |   188 ANSWERS
Confusing fan interference call from Blue Jays game was technically correct

Do you think Nathan Lukes would have caught the ball if not for fan interference?

Yes17191 %
No179 %
List of polls

BLUEJAYSCENTRAL.COM
COPYRIGHT @2025 - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
TERMS  -  POLICIES